One of the effective methods he used to persuade others to his way of thinking was through his use of rhetorical device in his speeches. A plebian might think that at worst, perhaps, either Antony or Brutus has made an honest mistake in his judgment of Caesar. It is safe to say that Antony makes the most of his opportunity. He finally uses ambiguous meanings in his words to hide his feelings about both Caesar and Brutus. Antony shakes hands with Trebonius last, transferring Caesar's blood, collected from his previous handshakes, to his clean hands.
He progressively hits upon the notes of ambition and honourable in a cadence that soon calls both terms into question. Through his conflicting motivations and interactions, Antony shows his true colors as a man that will stop at nothing to have power, even living a lie to become close with those in high places. Antony disguises his true intents in his speech, putting him at a moral high ground over Brutus. This paper will analyze the speech given by Susan… 1470 Words 6 Pages persuaded to believe that his death was necessary for the good of the republic. The emotion of appearing not to be foolish would probably best go along with this statement and rhetorical device. Ironically, nineteen years before this disaster, three astronauts were tragically lost in an accident on the ground.
He uses a range of rhetorical devices to manipulate the crowd. This paper provides an overview of The Civil Wars by Julius Caesar. The quotes repeated throughout their respective speeches and the appeals used also make an impact on the decision of the audience. By exploring the speeches of both Brutus and Mark Antony we are able to focus on the important details which alter one from the other. He can communicate with the crowd very well. Antony's speech came very shortly after Julius Caesar's death, and the city was in much chaos.
Then he pleases them : he does not intend to praise Caesar. It is known that both Brutus and Antony desired to appeal to the common people. Obviously Antony has two advantages over Burtus: his subterfuge and his chance to have the last word. People still say 'Friends, Romans, countrymen…! To summarise, the speech of Antony is remarkable for its effectiveness and the variety of devices. But Antony will spark doubt in people's minds, the sentence becomes more and more sarcastic, and then the murder will not seem legitimate any more. At the same time, he deifies Caesar, he makes his apotheosis, and shines through this new symbol.
After the conspirators have killed Caesar, Brutus agrees to let Antony perform… 780 Words 4 Pages A Comparison of Speeches by Brutus and Antony in William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar This historic play which was written by William Shakespeare in the 16 century as a play is in fact based on older history dating back to time before Christ. Burtus makes it very clear that Antony may speak whatever good he wishes of Caesar so long as he speaks no ill of the conspirators. A servant of Octavius enters to say that Octavius has arrived in Rome, and is waiting for Antony with Lepidus at Caesar's house. Brutus tells him that Caesar was destroying the republic and had to be removed from power. Antony understands the needs and wants of the people and uses this to prey upon their emotions and passions. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, rhetorical devices are commonly used to persuade the audience.
Antony stops them and finally reads the will, in which Caesar has given every Roman citizen seventy-five drachmas and the freedom to roam his land. Antony the Master of Rhetoric Antony's strong suit is rhetoric the art of speaking persuasively , which makes him a terrific politician. He was not expecting a reply when he would ask whether Caesar was ambitious. These eulogies are very powerful and speak to everyone. Act Three, Scene Three Cinna the poet not Cinna the conspirator is unable to sleep that night and wanders through the streets of Rome.
You know when your read the passage that he is brandishing it at people's sight. However, the way in which each man went about it differs drastically. He was not sharp enough to suspect the plot against Caesar, but it is Antony's masterful speech to the plebeians that stirs them up against his killers. Rhetoric is the art of persuasion and these many devices strengthen this by making points and highlighting flaws. At the conclusion of the scene, the crowd rushes off, rioting.
This conference was prepared in order to advance the goals of equality, development, and peace for all women everywhere in the interest of all humanity. He hath brought many captives home to Rome Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill: Did this in Caesar seem ambitious? Then he speaks of how the nation is moving forward, and here he uses pathos and speaks to the patriotism in the Americans. Marc Antony used three literary devices during his funeral oration, rhetorical question, sarcasm, and repetition, to successfully persuade the crowd. I fear there will a worse come in his place. However, he manages to keep his cool, until he is allowed to speak… 2122 Words 9 Pages Comparing the Speeches of Mark Antony and Brutus in Julius Caesar The play 'Julius Caesar' was first performed in 1599 at the Globe theatre in London. His speech appealed to ones emotions and used many rhetorical devices.