Section 5 of limitation act. SEC.5 OF LIMITATION ACT 2019-01-14
Section 5 of limitation act Rating:
8,8/10
1914
reviews
The Limitation Act 1963
Similarly, from the evidence on record, selling of jewelry by Rohit Sethi is not made out which is further augmented by the fact that even at the time of the suicide, the deceased was wearing a gold chain, two gold bangles, one pair of gold ears tops, four gold rings. Allegation was also made about the quarrel between the deceased and respondent No. Disability of one of several persons — Where one of several persons jointly entitled to institute a suit or make an application for the execution of a decree is under any such disability, and a discharge can be given without the concurrence of such person, time will run against them all; but, where no such discharge can be given, time will not run as against any of them until one of them becomes capable of giving such discharge without the concurrence of the others or until the disability has cased. One year When the purchaser takes under the sale sought to be impeached, physical possession of the whole or part of the property sold, or, where the subject matter of the sale does not admit of physical possession of the whole or part of the property, when the instruments of sale is registered. Over and above, in view of the fact that reasons mentioned in this application have not been controverted by the other side and also in view of the principles governing the discretionary exercise of power under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, we are of the view that sufficient cause has been stated for not filing the appeal in time and hence, delay caused in filing appeal is to be condoned and the application is required to be allowed. Similarly, there is no evidence for inflicting cruelty by respondent No.
Three years When the mortgagor reenters on the mortgaged property. Three years The date of the diversion. To the Supreme Court for Special leave to appeal, a In a case involving death sentence; Sixty days Th date of the judgment, final order or sentence. In order to secure these amounts how the deceased was harassed or treated with cruelty has not been explained nor has the Learned Additional Public Prosecutor been able to show any evidence linking these incidents of demand and alleged harassment or cruelty. An adoption deed registered in 1980.
Ontario: Section 5 of the Limitations Act always applies
Three years When the insurers elect to avoid the policy. Part 4 — Acquisition of ownership by possession 25. The agreement also provided for payment of 70% of the cost of agreed quantity of water irrespective of consumption. The costs must be real. Three years When the bill or note falls due. Explanation — for the purposes of this article — a Where the suit is by a remainder-man, a reversionary other than a landlord ; or a devisee the possession of the defendant shall be deemed to become adverse only when the estate of the remainder man, reversionary or devisee, as the case may be falls into possession; b Where the suit is by a Hindu or Muslim entitled to the possession of immovable property on the death of a Hindu or Muslim female the possession of the defendant shall be deemed to become adverse only when the female dies.
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor is unable to show any such harassment or cruelty which can be linked to these alleged demands of Rs. The decision in provides a teachable moment. To record an adjustment or satisfaction of a decree. Section 15 1 is attracted for excluding the period of stay for any suit institution of which has been stayed by an injunction or order issued by Court. This also cannot be disputed that in reversing the finding of acquittal the High Court has to keep in view the fact that the presumption of innocence is still available in favor of the accused which is rather fortified and strengthened by the order of acquittal passed in their favor.
But it is difficult to trace out how this has happened and, therefore, when the inquiry was conducted in detail, the facts were brought to the notice and on that basis the cause has arisen to file this appeal and the delay of 1067 days cause in filing the appeal is required to be condoned in the interest of justice. P, Hyderabad; Bhagwan Singh and Ors v. In the circumstances, if the son-in- law needed a generator, his asking his brother-in-law who is dealing in it has been held to be quite natural than arranging the same from a third person and it cannot have been construed as a demand for dowry. She also did not depose that on account of alleged demands for small amounts at times, the Respondent No. The summons of Special Civil Suit No. For compensation for trespass upon immovable property.
For compensation for doing or for omitting to do an act alleged to be in pursuance of any enactment in force for the time being in the territories to which this Act extends. The allegation of selling the jewelry of the deceased given to her at the time of the marriage was also made which had allegedly upset the deceased. By a landlord to recover possession from a tenant. State of Gujarat, 1996 4 Supreme 167; Jaswant Singh v. On a promissory-note or bond payable by installments. Three years When the loss or injury occurs. Thirty days The date o the sale.
Explanation — For the purpose of this section, — a In excluding the time during which a former civil proceeding was pending, the day on which that proceeding was instituted and the day on which it ended shall both be counted; b Plaintiff or an applicant resisting an appeal shall be deemed to be prosecuting a proceeding; c Misjoinder of parties or of causes of action shall be deemed to be a cause of a like nature with defect of jurisdiction. State of Punjab, 2009 Crl. Alleged harassment on account of demand for generator two days prior to the death of the deceased also cannot be inferred on account of infirmities in the statements of various witnesses and improvements made by these witnesses. Twelve years When the legacy or share becomes payable or deliverable. Twelve years When the forfeiture is incurred or the condition is broken.
The mother rather deposed that during the telephonic conversation she found her daughter to be normal. In any case no cruelty or harassment of any type has been established which can be attributed for meeting these demands and in the circumstances this finding of the trial Court cannot be held to be unsustainable or perverse. The legislature does not prescribe limitation with the object of destroying the rights of the parties but to ensure that they do not resort to dilatory tactics and seek remedy without delay. If so what is the period. Three years When the transfer becomes known to the plaintiff. While acquitting the respondents, namely, Sh. To alter or set aside any decision r order of a civil court any proceeding other than a suit of any act or order of an officer of Government in his official capacity.
